Everybody is talking about content farms as if they were the only type of sites hit by the latest large Google update. That’s a very limited viewpoint.
One of the most striking effects of the UK version of Google’s quality update dubbed Panda has been the huge losses by shopping search engines and review sites that focus on price comparison. Not all such services have lost though.
Among the losers were international heavyweights like:
They have felt the negative impact of the Panda update in the UK by losing at least half or in many cases most of their Google rankings. The press has been covering only Ciao.co.uk because it’s a Microsoft site which filed a complaint against Google prior to the update.
There is one obvious exception though, and nobody covers it. Pricerunner.co.uk hasn’t lost. Why? Just visit the site and then one or more of the others. Can you see it? You don’t have to be an SEO expert to find out what the difference is. I want to describe it anyway for those who don’t have the time to review the sites themselves in depth.
There are several quite obvious factors why Pricerunner has been spared as the only real price comparison site. They might be obvious to me but difficult to discern for you, so I will share my analysis of the positive aspects of Pricerunner that have made it stand out among the downranked shopping search industry:
Clean modern web design
It’s obvious that Pricerunner has a clean web design (diseño web), with lots of white space and a clear focus. It has a central feature article on top of the homepage, whereas most other price comparison sites just overwhelm the user with a portal-like link list nobody can overlook easily.
Proper usability and readability
It’s not just the positive first impression you get from looking at the Pricerunner site. You won’t bounce after visiting the homepage, but then you will stay even longer due to well-structured site architecture and readable structure.
Valuable editorial content
Unlike the other classic shopping search engines, which only display auto-fed content from the shops they work with, you’ll find really valuable editorial content on Pricerunner. I’ve tested the price comparison sites by looking for vacuum cleaners. I’m by no means an expert on them (who is?), so I was glad to find some additional in-depth info, aka “buying advice“, on what to look for. Otherwise only brands, reviews and prices would remain there to judge. That’s OK if you already know what you are looking for, but otherwise you don’t even know whether the reviews are trustworthy or the products worth their money.
Healthy backlink profile
I’ve compared the backlink profiles of both losers and the winner, and guess what I found right on top of my Open Site Explorer query? Both Ciao.co.uk and Idealo.co.uk, two sites out of those with the biggest losses during the quality update, had spammy links, guess where, on Google.com itself! They were placed on autogenerated Google Notebook pages (they have been removed now it seems). Apart from that they had barely any quality links. Ciao had several from Techcrunch because they have sued Google but that’s almost all. Pricerunner has the likes of Opera, DMOZ, Mashable and Search Engine Watch linking to it in highly relevant contexts.
Now just look at the main generic keywords Pricerunner is currently ranking for in the UK:
Whoever is responsible for Pricerunner’s content and SEO strategy deserves a raise of at least 50%. For all the others: copy this strategy now.
© SEOptimise – Download our free business guide to blogging whitepaper and sign-up for the SEOptimise monthly newsletter. Why Not All Shopping Search Engines Have Lost in the UK Google Panda/Quality Update
Related posts:
————-
Source
SEOptimise » Blog
The Panda Farmer update has not hit the UK yet but when it does the effect it will have on everyday websites could be huge. Ecommerce sites are particularly at risk.
We’ve been analysing quite few sites by looking at their Google Organic non-brand traffic from the US via the Custom Report below (click here to use) and there are some very worrying signs.

The image below is via SEObooks Panda preparation post – we have seen much bigger drops using the method above for certain sites.

What we have been doing is taking all the search traffic from the before and after the update (which was on 24th Feb) and looking to see which keywords and pages have dropped the most. To do this you need to download the data for the 4 weeks before and then compare to the 4 weeks after using the magic of vlookup in Excel. This gives you a view on your biggest problem pages.
One interesting thing we found is that the update is definitely not sitewide – there are a number of sites we looked at where the update had only hit pages of a certain type. For example ecommerce sites where the category pages were fine but product pages were hit hard.
Since this algorithm is US only we can easily compare the results before and after – simply search for the keyword on google.com and then add the &gl=us paramter to the end – click here and then here to see an example for “how to paint a wine glass”. Note that to get a fair test you need to use queries where Google is unlikely to favour UK sites.
So the first line of this post mentioned ecommerce sites. This update is going to cause major issues for anybody that has a large site with product descriptions that are duplicated across lots of other sites. If you have a few of these it’s not an issue to rewrite them but a lot of big ecommerce sites have 10,000+ products and to rewrite those is going to be a major headache.
When the update hit the US bloggers and the press were mainly quite pleased about the update as nobody likes the idea of content farms ranking. When the update hits the UK, where there are very few content farms, a lot of legitimate ecommerce sites are going to suddenly find themselves labelled as a content farm with 50% of Google Organic traffic disappearing overnight.
Not getting the rankings you want? Hire us for Search engine optimisation
Panda Update: Ecommerce sites at risk & an Analytics report to show how it’s hitting your US traffic today
————-
Source
Blogstorm
It has been a while since we have heard anything on the net neutrality front, so I thought I would give some recent updates in the ongoing battle. Net Neutrality (NN) is a contentious issue to be sure. For a more detail look in what the issues are so contentious, be sure to check out this previous article for an in depth look at what Net Neutrality debate is all about. At the heart of the debate came down to whether you should fear the government or fear your ISP regulating the flow of data that you recieve on the internet.

In December, the five-member FCC voted 3-2 to approve net neutrality rules that stopped service providers from blocking or retarding online access. The three Democrats on the commission voted for the rules, while the two Republican commissioners voted against it. Republicans have stuck by their arguments that a less-regulated Internet would spur investment and innovation.
Republicans argued that the FCC did not have the authority to pass such rules and introduced a resolution to overturn them The Senate and President Obama stated that they would veto the resolution if it came to his desk. A two-thirds vote by both houses would be needed to override a veto. On April 11th 2011, The House of Representatives overturned the FCC’s ruling.
On April 4th the debate continued over NN as members of the House took to the floor to debate and vote in a proposed resolution to overturn the FCC (Federal Communication Commission) standing net neutrality rules. After an hour long debate, over whether NN rules are even necessary, members voted 241 to 178 to take up the H.J. (House Joint) Res 37 later in the week. At the crux of the debate was whether government intervention and regulation will maintain the internet status quo, or lead to a web-based police-state. In the wake of the FCC’s rulings, Verizon Wireless and MetroPCS are planning to sue the FCC over their authority to regulate.
Some of the comments from the debate were:
"We should not trade the freedom of the Internet for a toll road provided by and for ISPs," said Rep. Jared Polis, a Colorado Democrat.
"We need to protect the Internet from government regulation," countered Rep. Rob Woodall, a Georgia Republican.
House majority leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., hailed the House vote for trying to thwart the FCC’s "harmful and partisan plan to regulate the Internet."
Sir Tim Berners-Lee, acknowledged as one of the creators of the internet, has spoken out to favor of the principle of net neutrality. He says that "self-regulation might lead to commercial interests taking precedence, and if this happened, governments should be prepared to step in to ensure that the web remained freely accessible to all."
The FCC rules have not only pitted Democrats against Republicans, but it has also split the business community. Internet service providers, such as AT&T, Comcast, and Verizon, opposed the rules, while companies thriving on an open internet, including Amazon, eBay, and Google, supported the regulations.
————-
Source
Beanstalk’s SEO News Blog
*
After watching the SEO industry debating the Google Panda or Content Farmer update as it was initially dubbed for weeks and now that the update has hit the UK as well I decided to compile a list of the most important resources on it.
This update seems to have hit far more SEO practicioners than average webmasters, that might be one of the reasons for the popularity of the topic.
Google itself says that 12% of search results have been impacted initially while in a survey 40% of US SEO practicioners admitted they have lost traffic in the update aftermath.
Content farmers have been hit but not all of them, the content farm that was the reason for the discussion on content farms got away unscathed. Demand Media’s eHow thrives even better than before. Why? It wasn’t really a content farms update.
It was a quality update as Google itself refers to it. Thus all kinds of sites have been affected even legit sites not following the content farm business model at all. Some of them have been reinstated after a public outcry though so it seems to be a good idea to ask your PR department for help when your rankings plummeted.
On the flip side it’s quite obvious what leads to rankings drops and what not do in order to stay on top in Google’s results in 2011.
Additionally I have already written how not to appear like a content farm.
OK, most of these aspects of this update have been covered already so I don’t have to repeat it. Instead check out these 30+ Google quality/panda update resources for content farmers and SEO practitioners.
Make sure not to miss the links to the UK specific statistics at the bottom.
Definition and overview
Reasons for ranking losses
Techniques to deal with the update
Issues apparent after the update
Analysis
Statistics and analytics
So you see, not only content farmers should care but those who defined the term weren’t affected as expected. So the Demand Media business model of content farming is far from gone. It just entered the next phase. More importantly
have been hit far more obviously.
Have you been affected by the recent quality update? How? Did you lose or gain rankings and traffic? Tell us in the comment section!
* Panda image by Scott Ableman.
© SEOptimise – Download our free business guide to blogging whitepaper and sign-up for the SEOptimise monthly newsletter. 30+ Google Quality/Panda Update Resources for Content Farmers and SEO Practitioners
Related posts:
————-
Source
SEOptimise » Blog
Contrary to popular belief, Pandas don’t just eat bamboo, they also eat local search (posicionamiento en buscadores) sites. My post on Yellow Pages SEO in the Post-Panda World is now live on SEL.
————-
Source
Local SEO Guide
Since the Panda / Farmer update hit the UK earlier this week most people with a website have been monitoring visitor numbers very closely for changes. A lot of people were well prepared for the update having seen their US traffic drop on 25th February but it’s still a big shock to lose 50% of your non-brand SEO traffic overnight.

Rank tracking companies such as Sistrix and Search Metrics have performed some analysis of rankings with the big losers aggregated in league tables on their blogs. This data is a bit misleading as so much of the drop was in the long tail and rankings don’t do a very good job of monitoring trends for the extreme long tail.
ReviewCentre.com was a big loser and issued a blog post describing the effects:
Running a website that regularly receives over 4 million visits a month isn’t trivial, nor cheap. We need to monetise our content to pay the wages of the staff that help to maintain this service. People visit our website, more often than not from search engines (most likely Google), and some of those people will click on adverts on our site. That’s how we manage to maintain Review Centre.
On Monday of this week, the ongoing upkeep of Review Centre suddenly became a lot more difficult. Google rolled out a major algorithmic shift (nicknamed the Panda Update), that was apparently an attempt to remove low quality websites from its search index. It affected Review Centre, and has resulted in a significant drop to our Google traffic. We weren’t the only ones – apparently several other high profile consumer review sites have been effected – Ciao, Qype, Dooyoo, and Reevoo.
We knew that today was coming. Panda was released in the US in late February. We saw our US traffic drop, and we knew it was only a matter of weeks until it reached the UK. It’s too early to say precisely what kind of a drop we’ve seen in the UK, but it is likely to be on a par with what we’ve seen in the US.
You can see just how big this drop was at the chart below.

When the US update was rolled out most of the biggest losers were what can safely be described as low value content. Exactly the sort of sites that we would expect to be hit with this sort of algorithm. A couple of weeks ago we posted about the fact that this update was likely to have a big effect on ecommerce sites when it hit the UK which was exactly right, the only thing we didn’t expect was the impact on tech blogs and voucher sites as shown in the Searchmetrics and Sistrix data.
We have looked at quite a few sites negatively affected by this update. Aside from the content farms, below are some of the more interesting cases.
Interestingly there are a lot of ecommerce sites we have seen that contain 100% duplicate content pulled from feeds or copied from competitors & manufacturers that are doing fine after Panda.
A final interesting point is that blogspot sites and very small sites which struggle to monetise themselves all seem to be winning here. This means that Google is probably getting more traffic to Google sites and making a lot more from Adsense after this.
The US version of the Panda update was designed to kill content farms. Now that the algorithm has changed and been rolled out in the UK we are seeing some very interesting things. It appears that the new algorithm is a mixture of a number of different mini-algorithms which look at different factors to downgrade sites, pages and entire directories.
One of the really impressive things about the update is the ability Google now has to detect duplicate content. The fact they are downgrading tech blogs which are posting about the same stories as hundreds of other sites is interesting as the content is technically unique but has no real value if hundreds of other sites say the same thing. How many times do we need to hear about the fact a new gadget has launched?
Also, for Google to use the Panda algorithm to remove traffic from a forum which is full of user generated content just shows how broad this update was in it’s scope.
Another thought is that this update started at 12% and has moved to 14%. I’m convinced that this algorithm will roll out across everything within 12 months. Google is basically saying that for the last few years their algorithm has been ranking the wrong type of sites and this is their way of redressing the balance in order to deliver a more positive user experience.
We are seeing an entirely new version of Google here.
Google has been very clever recently and has removed the ability for webmasters to submit reconsideration requests for algorithmic penalties. This means that their inboxes won’t be cluttered up with the thousands of webmasters complaining about Panda. It also means that a lot of sites are going to struggle to get around this.
We have taken on a number of sites this week with the specific aim of helping them recover their traffic levels. Branded3 does a lot of SEO analysis work and are asked to “fix” around 10-20 major penalties every year so this is nothing new.
Our advice to all sites is:
The points above sound really vague and the sort of stuff that every SEO has been preaching about for years. They are also pretty hard to do unless you are a very nimble business.
As of this week the points above are no longer an option, they are a requirement. Google has laid down a new algorithm here and even if you haven’t been affected yet then you need to read the writing on the wall and get started before this algorithm gets bigger.
The good news from all this is that there is still the same amount of traffic to go around it’s just being shared by a different set of sites. For every big loser in this there are thousands of winners.
With Google taking away 50% of a sites traffic you might assume that the 50% of traffic being lost was junk traffic with high bounce rates, low conversions and low engagement in general.
We’ve been looking through a number of sites this week (full analysis here) and have not seen any evidence to show that the traffic lost was in any way different to the traffic that stayed.

Please email me patrick @ branded3.com if you want any help fixing your site. We’re offering free help & advice.
Not getting the rankings you want? Hire us for Search engine optimisation
Analysing the UK Panda / Farmer update
————-
Source
Blogstorm
Late last night Google rolled out the Panda / Farmer update in the UK and confirmed the update on their official blog.
The latest update goes further than the original with 14% of queries now affected rather than 12%. They are also taking user data for blocked sites into account which wasn’t directly the case before.
We are seeing big changes for a lot of “how to” queries that we track. Ezinearticles.com and articlesbase.com are losing quite a lot of ground but are still ranking in the top 10 for a lot of queries. Interestingly Blogspot blogs and answers.google.com seem to be doing very well from this update, perhaps they are deemed higher quality than other user generated sites?
There is very little data to analyse so far but I will post again over the next few days.
Not getting the rankings you want? Hire us for Search engine optimisation
Google Panda / Farmer update hits the UK
————-
Source
Blogstorm